Patriotism and Constitutional Democracy
Since March 2003, the definition of patriotism has needed clarification. During that month the United States launched its second war in Iraq, and a majority of Congress and the public supported the decision. Those who dissented from the majority opinion were labeled as unpatriotic.
Today the Charleston Gazette published a much needed commentary on the matter. In summary, the newspaper explained patriotism as pride in one’s country, not unquestioned support of the political establishment.
Constitutional democracy was the most necessary and innovative political creation in history, Robert Byrd said yesterday before a celebratory assembly in Charleston. The state’s senior senator was adamant that government must serve the people, and not the opposite.
Ironically, in the 2004 election West Virginia supported the course set forth by President Bush, despite Sen. Byrd’s warning that the administration was not acting in the best interest of the country.
As mid-term elections near, the state’s citizens would be well served to reflect on their views of patriotism, which is not to suggest that we withdrawal support from our troops, but more so that we seek to better understand the motives of those in power. If we find that those motives are indeed not in our best interest, then working to change course does not mean we are unpatriotic. It means we are championing our democratic rights.

